Supreme Court of India
Digital Supreme Court Reports
The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online)
Home
Full Text

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH vs. SINGHARA SINGH AND OTHERS

SCR Citation: [1964] 4 S.C.R. 485
Year/Volume: 1964/ Volume 4
Date of Judgment: 16 August 1963
Petitioner: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Disposal Nature: Appeal Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 1963 INSC 173
Judgment Delivered by: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sarkar
Respondent: SINGHARA SINGH AND OTHERS
Case Type: CRIMINAL APPEAL /31/1962
Order/Judgment: Judgment
1. Headnote

Criminal Procedure-Evidence Respondents accused of mur- der-Magistrate not empowered to record a confession records a con- fession-Records of confession not held to be admissible by the trial Court-The Magistrate gives oral evidence of confession-The records used to refresh his memory-Whether the oral evidence is admissible Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act 5 of 1898), 54. 164,364, 533-Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), 55. 74 80 and 159.

By sub-sec. (1) of s. 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure it was provided, "Any Presidency Magistrate, any Magistrate of the first class and any Magistrate of the second class specially em- powered in this behalf by State Government may, if he is not a police officer record any statement or confession made to him in the course of an investigation under this Chapter or under any other law for the time being in force or at any time afterwards before the commencement of the inquiry or trial." " In a case where a confession had been recorded under s. 164(1) by a Magistrate of the second class not specially empowered,

2. Case referred
3. Act
      No Data Found!!!!!
4. Keyword
  • CRPC
  • Murder
  • Confession
  • Recording of Confession
5. Equivalent citation
    Citation(s) 1963 AIR 358 =