CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: s. 482 read with s.401 - Quashing of criminal
proceedings - Allegations levelled by prosecutrix against
accused for commission offences punishable u/ss 328, 354
and 376 on false promise of marriage - Charge-sheet filed -
Charges framed - Held: In the charge sheet, Investigating
Officer acknowledged that he could not find any proof to substantiate the charges - Charge-sheet was filed only on the
basis of statement of prosecutrix u/s 164 - Further, in view of
scientific investigation as revealed by mobile phones of
prosecutrix and accused, commission of offence as alleged
by prosecutrix cannot be established in trial - Therefore, judicial conscience of High Court ought to have persuaded
it, on the basis of the material available before if to quash
criminal proceedings initiated against appellant, in exercise
of inherent powers vested with it u/s 482 - Accordingly, FIR,
consequential charge-sheet as also charges framed by trial court are quashed - Penal Code, 1860 - ss.328, 354 and
376.
On the basis of the statement of the complainant/
prosecutrix, an FIR was registered against the appellant for offences punishable u/ss 328 and 354 IPC. The
appellant-accused was arrested on the same day. Five
days thereafter the prosecutrix made a supplementary
statement alleging that the accused, on the assurance of
getting her married, had physical relations with her several times, the latest being one and half months prior to the date of the FIR. Accordingly, the offence punishable
u/s 376 IPC was added to the case. Subsequently,
statement of complainant/prosecutrix was recorded u/s
164 CrPC by the Metropolitan Magistrate. The police filed
charge-sheet for offences punishable u/ss 328, 354 and B
376 IPC. The writ petition filed by the petitioner alleging
false implication and seeking to quash the FIR was
dismissed by the High Court. Even the writ petition filed
by the prosecutrix seeking to quash the FIR filed by her
was also dismissed. The order framing the charges having been unsuccessfully challenged by the accused,
in revision before the High Court, he filed the instant
appeal.