Supreme Court of India
Digital Supreme Court Reports
The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online)
Home
Full Text

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ANR. vs. UNION OF INDIA

SCR Citation: [2014] 6 S.C.R. 456
Year/Volume: 2014/ Volume 6
Date of Judgment: 28 May 2014
Petitioner: RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ANR.
Disposal Nature: Appeal Allowed
Neutral Citation: 2014 INSC 410
Judgment Delivered by: Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.S. Nijjar
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA
Case Type: CIVIL APPEAL /5765/2014
Order/Judgment: Judgment
1. Headnote

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - ss. 16 and 34 - Applicability of the Act - Arbitration petition u/s. 34 - Maintainability of - Parties-appellants entering into two Product Sharing Contracts (PSCs) with the Government of India, providing for exploration and production of petroleum - Disputes between parties regarding payments of royalties, cess, service tax and GAG audit report- Notice of arbitration - Constitution of arbitral tribunal - Under Article 33. 12 of PSCs, the venue of arbitration would be London - Amendment in the PSC, by agreement of the parties, Final Partial Consent Award by arbitral tribunal that juridical seat for arbitration would be London, England - 'Final Partial Award that appellants' claims are arbitrable - Petition u/s. 34 by respondent challenging Final Partial Award - Allowed by High Court holding that the arbitration petition was maintainable - On appeal, held: Petition u/s. 34 is riot maintainable - Applicability of Arbitration Act, 1996 to the arbitration agreement has been excluded - It cannot be said that even though the arbitration agreement would be governed by the laws of England and that juridical seat of arbitration would be in London, Part I of the Arbitration Act would stiff be applicable as the laws governing the substantive contract are Indian Laws - Upon a meaningful reading of the said Articles of the PSC, that the proper law of the contract is Indian Law; proper law of the arbitration agreement is the law of England - Applicability of Arbitration Act, 1996 has been ruled out by a conscious decision and agreement of the parties - In the event, final award is made against the respondent, the enforceability of the same in India, can be resisted on the ground of Public Policy- Remedy against the award will have to be sought in England, where the juridical seat is located - International Commercial Arbitration.

Doctrines/Principles - Principle of separability - Held: Permits the parties to agree that law of one coμntry would govern to the substantive contract and laws of another country would apply to the arbitration agreement.

2. Case referred
3. Act
      No Data Found!!!!!
4. Keyword
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Product sharing Contracts
5. Equivalent citation
    Citation(s) 2014 AIR 3218 = 2014 (7) SCC 603 = 2014 (7) Suppl. SCC 603 = 2014 (7) JT 388 = 2014 (7) Suppl. JT 388 = 2014 (7) SCALE 401