Supreme Court of India
Digital Supreme Court Reports
The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online)
Home
Full Text

THE PARBHANI TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. vs. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

SCR Citation: [1960] 3 S.C.R. 177
Year/Volume: 1960/ Volume 3
Date of Judgment: 07 March 1960
Petitioner: THE PARBHANI TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
Disposal Nature: Petition Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 1960 INSC 40
Judgment Delivered by: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sarkar
Respondent: THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
Case Type: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) /110/1959
Order/Judgment: Judgment
1. Headnote

Motor Vehicles-Grant of stage carriage permit to Government under Ch. IV-Constitutional validity-Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (4 of 1939), as amended by Act 100 of 1956, ch. IV. ss. 42, 47, ch, IVA, s. 68F(1) - Constitution of India, Arts. 19(2)(g), 14.

The petitioner, a registered co-operative society, carrying on the business of plying motor buses as stage carriages, had permits for four routes which were due to expire. The State applied for permits for all these routes under Ch. IV of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, as amended by Act 100 of 1956, and the petitioner applied for renewal of its own permits. The Regional Transport Authority rejected the petitioner's applications and granted those of the State. The petitioner's appeal to the State Transport Authority was rejected. But the High Court quashed the said orders under Art. 226 and directed a reconsideration of the matter. The State published a scheme under s. 68C, Ch. IVA, of the Act. The scheme was not however finalised. Thereafter the Regional Transport Authority, purporting to reconsider the matter as directed by the High Court, rejected the petitioner's applications for renewal and granted those of the State for permits. It was contended on behalf of the petitioner that in view of Ch. IVA of the Act, the State had no right to apply for permits except thereunder and the grant of permits on applications made under Ch. IV was, therefore, illegal and infringed the petitioner's fundamental rights under Arts. 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. It was further contended that the order violated Art. 14 as well.

2. Case referred
3. Act
      No Data Found!!!!!
4. Keyword
  • Motor Vehicles
  • Grant of stage carriage permit
  • Constitutional validity
5. Equivalent citation
    Citation(s) 1960 AIR 801 =