Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Rate of interest to be
charged on home loan – Home buyer filed loan application,
opting an adjustable rate of interest – Manager of the Bank
assured that the rate of interest would be charged based on
the Prime Lending Rate of RBI – Loan amount disbursed,
and thereafter, the rate of interest was revised from 7.25%
pa to 8.25% pa despite RBI not having changed the Prime
Lending Rate and was further increased to 10.5% pa though
no change made by RBI – Consumer complaint – National
Consumer held that home buyer was bound by the terms
and conditions of the agreement while the bank was bound
by various instructions of RBI at the time of signing the
agreement – Interference with:
Held: Respondent No.1 being a NBFC and as a corporate body
would be bound by its policies and procedures with regard to
lending and recovery – Applicability of the rate of interest to be
charged is a policy matter and cannot be case-specific unless
the individual agreement entered into between the parties indicate
otherwise – When the parties have signed the agreement, the terms
agreed therein would bind the parties and the email exchanged
between the parties cannot override the policy decisions of the
institution – Having executed the agreement; having agreed to
the terms and conditions; having received the loan amount, the
appellant-home buyer cannot raise any objection for the first time
when the rate of interest was increased after having acquiesced by
signing the agreement – Further, the appellant having repaid the
loan amount with interest as per the terms of agreement cannot
make out a grievance in hindsight and seek refund of the amount
paid – In view thereof, no error has been committed so as to call
for interference. [Para 10 – 16]