Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 0. 1, r.10, 0.22, r.10 - Suit for specific performance of
contract - During pendency of the suit defendant transferring
the property - Application by appellant-transferee for
impleadment as defendant - HELD: Appellant entered into
a clandestine transaction with the defendants and got the
property
transferred in its favour - Therefore, the appellant cannot be held to be a bonafide purchaser, without notice - It
is true that the application which the appellant made was only
under O. I r.10 CPC but the enabling provision of 0.22, r. 10
CPC could always be invoked if the fact situation so
E demanded - In the facts and circumstances of the case and
also for the ends of justice, the appellant is to be added as
party-defendant in the suit -Specific Relief Act, 1963- s. 19
- Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.52 - Doctrine of lis
pendens.
The plaintiff-respondent no. 1 filed a suit on 1.11.1991
against the defendants-respondents for specific
performance of the agreement dated 29.5.1986,
whereunder the defendants had agreed to sell the suit
property to the plaintiff-respondent no. 1. Appearance was put on behalf of the defendants and on the basis of
the statement made on their behalf court on 4.11.1991
passed an interim order not to alienate the suit property.
However, between 31.1.2001 and 3.4.2001 five sale deeds
were executed by the defendants in favour of the appellant. On the basis of these sale deeds the appellant A
moved an application under 0.1, r.10. CPC, for
impleadment as defendant in the suit for specific
performance filed by the plaintiff-respondent no. 1. The
Single Judge of the High Court rejected the application.
The FAO filed by the appellant was also dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court.
In the instant appeal, the question for consideration
before the Court was: "whether the appellant who is the
transferee pendente lite having notice and knowledge about the pendency of the suit for specific performance
and order of injunction can be impleaded as party under
Order 1 Rule 10 on the basis of sale deeds executed in its favour by the defendants".