Supreme Court of India
Digital Supreme Court Reports
The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online)
Home
Full Text

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI vs. UNION OF INDIA

SCR Citation: [2023] 9 S.C.R. 493
Year/Volume: 2023/ Volume 9
Date of Judgment: 11 May 2023
Petitioner: GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
Disposal Nature: Reference answered
Neutral Citation: 2023 INSC 517
Judgment Delivered by: Honble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA
Case Type: CIVIL APPEAL /2357/2017
Order/Judgment: Judgment
1. Headnote

Constitution of India: Seventh Schedule – List II, Entry 41 – Art.239AA(3(a)) – NCT Delhi – Control Over Services – Distribution of Power Between Union and State – IAS (Cadre) Rules, 1954 –The Indian Administrative Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955 – r.2(c) – All India Services (Joint Cadre) Rules 1972 – Union Ministry of Home Affairs issued a notification dated 21 May 2015 which provided that the Lieutenant Governor of NCT Delhi shall exercise control over “services”, in addition to “publicorder”, “police”, and “land” – Notification was challenged before the High Court which in turn upheld the constitutionality of thenotification – High Court declared that “the matters connected with‘Services’ fall outside the purview of the Legislative Assembly of NCT of Delhi” – On appeal being filed, two judge bench of this court delivered a split verdict – Hence, the question came for consideration before the Constitution Bench – Held: The references to “State Government” in relevant Rules of All India Services or Joint Cadre Services, of which National Capital Territory of Delhi(NCTD) is a part or which are in relation to NCTD, shall mean the Government of NCTD – It is evident that the Legislative Assembly of NCTD does not exercise exclusive legislative powers over all the entries in the State List – It is only in a demarcated constitutional sphere that it is able to exercise its legislative power – It is the responsibility of the government of NCTD to give expression to the will of the people of Delhi who elected it – Therefore, the ideal conclusion would be that Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) ought to have control over “services”, subject to exclusion of subjects which are out of its legislative domain –NCTD has already exercised its legislative power relating to Entry 41 of the State List – NCTD has legislative and executive power with respect to “services” under Entry 41 – The legislative and executive power of control of NCTD over Entry 41 shall not extend over to services related to “public order”, “police”, and “land” –However, legislative and executive power over services such as Indian Administrative Services, or Joint Cadre services, which are relevant for the implementation of policies and vision of NCTD in terms of day-to-day administration of the region shall lie with NCTD– Officers thereunder may be serving in NCTD, even if they were not recruited by NCTD – The Lieutenant Governor is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of NCTD in relation to matters within the legislative scope of NCTD – As NCTD has legislative power over “services” (excluding ‘public order’, ‘police’,and ‘land’) under Entry 41 in List II, the Lieutenant Governor shall be bound by the decisions of GNCTD on services – Any reference to “Lieutenant Governor” over services (excluding services related to ‘public order’, ‘police’ and ‘land’) in relevant Rules shall mean Lieutenant Governor acting on behalf of GNCTD.

Constitution of India: Article 239AA, 239AA(3(b)) &239AA(7) – Interpretation of phrase “insofar as such matter is applicable to Union Territories” in Art.239AA – Held: The intent and purpose of Article 239AA(3(b)) and Article 239AA(7) is to confer an expanded legislative competence upon Parliament, when it comes to Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD)clearly since it is the capital of the country and therefore, must be dealt with different considerations – To interpret the phrase “insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union territories” in a restrictive manner would limit the legislative power of the elected members of the assembly – Thus, the legislative competence of National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) must be interpreted to give full impetus to the will of the electorate – The executive power of NCTD is co-extensive with its legislative power, that is, it shall extend to all matters with respect to which it has the power to legislate – The phrase ‘insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories’ in Article 239AA(3) cannot be read to further exclude the legislative power of NCTD over entries in the State List or Concurrent List,over and above those subjects which have been expressly excluded– Union Territories – NCT of Delhi.

Constitution of India – Art. 239AA – Phrase “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution” in Article 239AA(3) – Held: With reference to the phrase “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution” in Article 239AA(3), the legislative power of National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) is to be guided, and not just limited, by the broader principles and provisions of the Constitution.

Constitution of India – Federalism and Democracy – Cooperative Federalism – Held: Our model of federalism expects a sense of cooperation between the Union at the centre, and the regional constitutionally recognised democratic units – The Union and National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) need to cooperate in a similar manner to the Union and the States – The interpretation of the Constitution must enhance the spirit of federalism and democracy together – In the spirit of cooperative federalism, the Union of India must exercise its powers within the boundaries created by the Constitution – NCTD, having a sui generis federal model,must be allowed to function in the domain charted for it by the Constitution – The Union and NCTD share a unique federal relationship – It does not mean that NCTD is subsumed in the unit of the Union merely because it is not a “State”.

Constitution of India – Interpretation – Held: The design of the Constitution is such that it accommodates the interests of different regions – While providing a larger constitutional umbrella to different states and Union territories, it preserves the local aspirations of different regions – “Unity in diversity” is not only used in common parlance, but is also embedded in our constitutional structure – The interpretation of the Constitution must give substantive weight to the underlying principles.

Constitution of India: Part XIV – Arts. 308 & 367 – General Clause Act, 1897 – s.3(58) – Inclusion of Union Territory – In the Definition of State – Whether Union Territory is a State for the Purpose of Part XIV of Constitution of India – Held: s.3(58) of the General Clauses Act, by virtue of Art.367(1) of the Constitution,applies to the construction of the expression ‘State’ in the Constitution, unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context of a particular provision of the Constitution – There is nothing in the subject or context of Part XIV of the Constitution which would exclude its application to Union territories – Rather the application of the inclusive definition of “State” as provided under Clause 3(58) would render the constitutional scheme envisaged for Union Territories workable.

Union Territories – There does not exist a homogeneous class of Union Territories with similar governance structures.

Union Territories – Constitution of India – Art. 239AA – National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) – Held: Is not similar to other Union Territories – By virtue of Article 239AA, NCTD is accorded a “sui generis” status, setting it apart from other Union Territories – The Legislative Assembly of NCTD has competence over entries in List II and List III except for the expressly excluded entries of List II – In addition to the Entries in List I, Parliament has legislative competence over all matters in List II and List III in relation to NCTD, including the entries which have been kept out of the legislative domain of NCTD by virtue of Article 239AA(3)(a).

Union Territories – National Capital Territory of Delhi(NCTD) – Executive power of NCTD – Held: The executive power of NCTD is co-extensive with its legislative power, that is, it shall extend to all matters with respect to which it has the power to legislate – The Union of India has executive power only over the three entries in List II over which NCTD does not have legislative competence – The executive power of NCTD with respect to entries in List II and List III shall be subject to the executive power expressly conferred upon the Union by the Constitution or by a law enacted by Parliament.

Union Territories – National Capital Territory of Delhi(NCTD) – Legislative and executive power over “Services” – Held: NCTD has legislative and executive power over “Services”, that is, Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule because: (i) The definition of State under Section 3(58) of the General Clauses Act 1897 applies to the term “State” in Part XIV of the Constitution – Thus, Part XIV is applicable to Union territories; and (ii) The exercise of rule making power under the proviso to Article 309 does not oust the legislative power of the appropriate authority to make laws over Entry 41 of the State List – Constitution of India – Art. 309 and Seventh Schedule, List II, Entry 41.

2. Case referred
3. Act
  • Constitution Of India
4. Keyword
  • Constitution of India: Seventh Schedule – List II
  • Entry 41 – Art.239AA(3(a)) – NCT Delhi
  • Control Over Services
  • Distribution of Power Between Union and State
  • IAS (Cadre) Rules 1954