Supreme Court of India
Digital Supreme Court Reports
The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online)
Home
Full Text

H. S. BAINS DIRECTOR SMALL SAVING-CUM-DEPUTY SECRETARY, FINANCE, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH vs. THE STATE (UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH)

SCR Citation: [1981] 1 S.C.R. 935
Year/Volume: 1981/ Volume 1
Date of Judgment: 10 October 1980
Petitioner: H. S. BAINS DIRECTOR SMALL SAVING-CUM-DEPUTY SECRETARY, FINANCE, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH
Disposal Nature: Appeal Dismissed
Neutral Citation: 1980 INSC 199
Judgment Delivered by: Hon'ble Mr. Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy
Respondent: THE STATE (UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH)
Case Type: CRIMINAL APPEAL/687/1980
Order/Judgment: Judgment
1. Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure 1898-Section 190(1)(b) and (c) Scope of- Magistrate ordered investigation under section 156(3)-Police submitted report under section 173-Disagreeing with police report Magistrate directed issue of process Magistrate if competent to take cognizance of complaint under section 190(1)(b).


On a complaint by the complainant that the appellant, armed with a revolver and accompanied by two persons, trespassed into his house and threatened to kill him, the Magistrate ordered investigation by the police under section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In their report under section 173 the police stated that the complaint was false in that on the date and time mentioned therein, the appellant was at a different place far away from the place where the complainant alleged that the appellant had threatened to kill him. Disagreeing with the conclusion of the police the Magistrate took cognizance of the case under sections 448, 451 and 506 I.P.C. and directed the issue of process to the appellant. The appellant's petition seeking to quash the proceedings before the Magistrate was dismissed by the High Court.


In appeal to this Court, it was contended on behalf of the appellant that the Magistrate was not competent to take cognizance of the case as if it was upon a police report since the report under section 173 by the police did not disclose any offence having been committed by the appellant.

2. Case referred
3. Act
      No Data Found!!!!!
4. Keyword
  • Code of Criminal Procedure 1898-Section 190(1)(b) and (c}-Scope of- Mlllgistrate ordered invesPigation under section 156(3}-Police submitted report under section 173-Disagreeing with police report Magistrate directed issue of process-Magistrate if comperent to take cognizance of complaint under sec- tion 190(1)(b).
5. Equivalent citation
    Citation(s) 1980 AIR 1883 = 1980 (4) SCC 631 = 1980 (4) Suppl. SCC 631 =