Supreme Court of India
Digital Supreme Court Reports
The Official Law Report Fortnightly ISSN: 3048-4839 (Online)
Home
Full Text

GOVIND SARAN GANGA SARAN vs. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND ORS.

SCR Citation: [1985] 3 S.C.R. 985
Year/Volume: 1985/ Volume 3
Date of Judgment: 26 April 1985
Petitioner: GOVIND SARAN GANGA SARAN
Disposal Nature: Appeal Allowed
Neutral Citation: 1985 INSC 107
Judgment Delivered by: Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S. Pathak
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX AND ORS.
Case Type: CIVIL APPEAL /2083/1974
Order/Judgment: Judgment
1. Headnote

Central Sales Tax Act, ss. 14 and 15 read with Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act 1941, 5.5 (2) (a) (ii)-Scope of Goods declared to be of special import- ance in inter-State trade or commerce-Omission to specify the single point at which the tax may be levied Effect of.


The appellant, a registered dealer under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act 1941 as applied to the Union Territory of Delhi (for short, the State Act) used to purchase Cotton yarn and sell it to registered dealers, unregistered 4 dealers and consumers. He submitted his return of turnover under the State Act for the assessment year 1968-69 and claimed exemption in respect of the-turn- over of sales of cotton thread on the ground that it was an exempted item under Entry 21 of the Second Schedule. The Sales Tax Officer held that the sales were liable to tax as the same were effected in respect of cotton yarn. The appellant ultimately went in revision to the Financial Commissioner who proceeding on the basis that the sales were in respect of cotton yarn, which was a declared item under s.14 of the Central Sales Tax Act allowed the revision petition holding that they could not be subjected to sales tax because one of the conditions prescribed by s.15 of that Act had not been complied with, that is to say, the law had omitted to prescribe the single point at which the levy could alone be imposed. Aggrieved by the order of the Financial Commissioner, the Revenue filed a writ petition in the High Court which, relying on the construction placed by it on sub-clause (ii) of cl.(a) of s.5 in Fitwell Engineers v. Financial Commissloner Delhi Admn. (1975) 35 S.T.C. 66, allowed the petition holding that the single point in a series of sales is the sale made by the last registered dealer among successive dealers when he sold the goods to an unauthorised dealer or a consumer. Hence this Appeal.

2. Case referred
3. Act
  • Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (74 of 1956)
  • Bengal Finance (sales Tax) Act, 1941 (6 of 1941)
4. Keyword
  • Central Sales Tax Act
  • ss
  • 14 and 15
5. Equivalent citation
    Citation(s) 1985 AIR 1041 = 1985 (1) SCALE 986